Adnimation ATF

Collapse

MECF_728x90_top

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
1 of 2 < >

Corvette Today: Meet The E-Ray Integration Engineer Cody Buckley

On this episode of CORVETTE TODAY, you'll meet one of the fresh, new shining faces of the Corvette team. Cody Bulkley (pronounced Buckley) is the Performance Integration Engineer for the new Corvette E-Ray. Now, you're probably saying to yourself, "What is a Performance Integration Engineer?" https://youtu.be/jAlb0CCv6eI?si=YbBYl7OqiAkWWq-h; https://podcasts.adorilabs.com/corve...Yj6dBD5JYh43W0

Cody explains that when he sits down with your CORVETTE TODAY host, Steve Garrett. Plus, Cody is the guy who did that awesome "Cyclone Spin" in New York City's Rockefeller Center on January 17th, 2023 when the Corvette E-Ray debuted.

Cody's excitement and enthusiasm for the new E-Ray is blatantly obvious in this episode of CORVETTE TODAY...it makes me want one!

You can also see the video of the Cyclone Spin on this new episode of CORVETTE TODAY!
2 of 2 < >

2024 & 2023 Corvette Info Including E-Ray, SR & Z06 Pricing, SR & Z06 Visualizers, 70th Anniversary Info, Press Releases for SR & Z06 & Their Build & Price, Order Guides & Visualizers

2024 Order Guide Here: https://www.gmfleetorderguide.com/NA...=22639&type=0#
2023 Corvette Brochure: https://www.chevrolet.com/content/da...D7Q0fp8nIEE57Y
E-Ray Visualizer: https://visualizer.chevrolet.com/ui?...US&channel=b2c
Official E-Ray Press Release: https://www.midenginecorvetteforum.c...-press-release
Official GM E-Ray Pictures: https://www.midenginecorvetteforum.c...and-visualizer
+ 25 KEY E-Ray Components/Factors: https://www.midenginecorvetteforum.c...rs-information
E-Ray Leaked Info/Visualizer: https://www.midenginecorvetteforum.c...tte-e-ray-leak
Z51 & Z06 GM Track Specs: https://www.midenginecorvetteforum.c...ecommendations
Z06 BUILD & PRICE: https://www.chevrolet.com/performanc...d-price/config
Z06 Order Guide: https://www.gmfleetorderguide.com/NA...D=22412&type=0
Z06 MSRP and Options Pricing: https://www.midenginecorvetteforum.c...freight-charge
2023 SR Build & Price: https://www.midenginecorvetteforum.c...up-and-running
*2023 SR & Z06 Official Owners Manual: https://www.corvetteblogger.com/docs...ersManual.pdf; and,
https://www.midenginecorvetteforum.c...owner-s-manual
* 2023 GM Bash Major Seminar with HQ video: https://www.midenginecorvetteforum.c...ore-bash-video
*2023 Stingray Visualizer: https://visualizer.chevrolet.com/ui?...US&channel=b2c
* COPMPLETE 2023 STINGRAY PRICING: https://www.corvetteactioncenter.com...ion-Center.pdf
*2023 Stingray (ONLY Order Guide: https://www.gmfleetorderguide.com/NA...D=22412&type=0
*70th Anniversary Combined Press Release For SR & Z06: https://www.midenginecorvetteforum.c...iversary-model
*Z06 Press Release: https://www.midenginecorvetteforum.c...-press-release
*Z06 Reveal Pictures: https://www.midenginecorvetteforum.c...eveal-pictures
*Z06 Visualizer: https://visualizer.chevrolet.com/ui?...US&channel=b2c
Order Guide (unofficial): https://www.midenginecorvetteforum.c...-action-center
*Z06 vs Z07 Aero Components: https://www.midenginecorvetteforum.c...s-similarities
See more
See less

NASCAR Hendricks Camaro at Le Mans

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    I figured the brakes would be an issue but the weather was the real equalizer for many.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Vette Interested

      But it’s interesting that a beast that big can handle well enough to be as faster or faster than the GTE cars. I’m guessing as the race progresses, brakes could very well be an issue but we shall see. It’s creating a lot of interest which is exactly what the parties involved we’re hoping for.
      Just goes to show, once again, the horsepower is King, and the best way to make horsepower is with displacement. Everything else is secondary. The chassis was good enough, but the big unrestricted V-8 was the difference maker. Imagine what a C8.R could do with an unrestricted LT6.





      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Vette Interested
        I figured the brakes would be an issue but the weather was the real equalizer for many.
        The brake change was not the big time killer. It was a transmission problem, which required dropping the transmission. A lot of other competitors had drivetrain problems and retired, so that was not just a Cup Car weakness for this race.

        The Le Mans NASCAR Camaro was about 500 lbs. lighter than the Cup Car, and they ran carbon ceramic discs. Everyone in a 24 Hour race has to complete at least one brake change, and they have assembled components ready to bolt on and hook up. That can be relatively quick.

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by dcbingaman
          Just goes to show, once again, the horsepower is King, and the best way to make horsepower is with displacement. Everything else is secondary. The chassis was good enough, but the big unrestricted V-8 was the difference maker. Imagine what a C8.R could do with an unrestricted LT6.
          Every other competitor could say the same thing. They are all capable of producing the same or more "unrestricted LT6" power, and it no longer requires big displacement to be capable of running a 24-hour race. That might have been true once upon a time, but no longer.

          Comment


          • #20
            Actually the brakes were a big time killer at the time. Not as much as the transmission but according to ESPN news service, they reported that the No. 24 Camaro might actually beat the entire 21-car GTE AM field. “The time to fix the brakes took that off the table, and it felt like a disappointment for all that NASCAR had accomplished”. They later had the transmission issue that added to their issues. Overall, a great effort by the Hendrick team.
            Last edited by Vette Interested; 06-11-2023, 04:00 PM.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Foosh

              Every other competitor could say the same thing. They are all capable of producing the same or more "unrestricted LT6" power, and it no longer requires big displacement to be capable of running a 24-hour race. That might have been true once upon a time, but no longer.
              Every other competitor DID say the same thing once upon a time, it was called Can-Am. That era gave us the McLaren M8, the Porsche 917-30, and the UOP Shadow. Today's cars are a BIT faster than those brutes, but not by much. Give me Denny Hulme and Mark Donahue in one of those monsters any day for pure entertainment value. The problem, of course, is $$$ and the literal size of racetracks. Can-Am proved that TOO MUCH can be TOO MUCH, as opposed to NEVER ENOUGH when it comes to safety, cost and competition. The BoP is largely to insure that you don't have one competitor dominate like they did in Can-Am and what we saw with McLaren, Mercedes and now Red Bull in F1.

              From a pure engineering standpoint, horsepower is defined by airflow - how much you can burn to drive the wheel shafts. Engine weight goes up by the square of area, but HORSEPOWER goes up linearly with airflow, which goes up by the CUBE of area. What that means, is displacement - literally the volume of air an engine can process instantaneously, is THE most important factor in any engine power-to-weight ratio. Bigger engines are more efficient. That is why EACH B747 engine engulfs over 1500 Lbm / Sec of airflow. There is no other way to get such a thing across the Atlantic with 400 passengers - certainly not with turbocharged 3-liter V-8's or V-12's driving props.

              Comment


              • #22
                Yes, once upon a time, but that's now ancient history. Everyone is restricted in class racing, and the NASCAR Camaro at Le Mans was just a demonstration project meant to build fan interest. There are no lessons to be learned from that.

                You could have done the same demonstration project and power with a twin-turbo 3.8 Boxer engine or V6. Today's twin turbo Porsche 992 Turbo S (3.7L) street machine, is producing the same power as the LT6 in the street Z06, but the racing GT3 RS Porsche is limited to about 500HP just like the C8R.

                I do know as an airline guy that 747s are now obsolete in favor of more efficient twins.
                Last edited by Foosh; 06-11-2023, 07:56 PM.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Vette Interested
                  Actually the brakes were a big time killer at the time. Not as much as the transmission but according to ESPN news service, they reported that the No. 24 Camaro might actually beat the entire 21-car GTE AM field. “The time to fix the brakes took that off the table, and it felt like a disappointment for all that NASCAR had accomplished”. They later had the transmission issue that added to their issues. Overall, a great effort by the Hendrick team.
                  So, if it was reported upon, I missed it and can't find any info on it, but did the Hendricks team have to do more than one brake change? Everyone in a 24-hour race plans on at least one brake change, as the Corvette Racing Team is very familiar with and always plans for. I certainly would have expected that the Hendricks team did their research and understood that. If they gambled on being able get by without a brake change by running CCBs, then they gambled big time and lost.

                  I did see one article referring to an "unplanned" brake change. That could have just been inaccurate reporting. If they had to do a 2nd brake change, you may have a point.

                  However, they lost way more time due to the transmission problem.
                  Last edited by Foosh; 06-11-2023, 08:34 PM.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Foosh

                    So, if it was reported upon I missed it and can't find reporting on it, but did the Hendricks team have to do more than one brake change? Everyone in a 24-hour race plans on at least one brake change. I'm sure they did their research and understood that, but I did see one article referring to an "unplanned" brake change. If that was a 2nd brake change you may have a point.

                    However, they lost way more time due to the transmission problem.
                    Of course they lost MUCH more time with the transmission change but the initial brake issue is what initially caused them to fall behind the GTE AM field. As far as how many brake changes they did I do not know.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      So, they would have fallen way behind anyway with the transmission problem. I was impressed that they got the car back on the track after dropping and replacing/fixing the transmission. That showed a lot of grit.

                      I was hoping they'd last and do a lot better, but if they had, it wouldn't have been a huge surprise because they didn't have to deal with class rules and had a lot more power than any of the GTE-Am cars.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Considering their car completed over 2,400 miles, four times longer than their longest scheduled race, (Coca Cola 600) the results were excellent. So many items could have failed but did not. And unlike many of the cars in the GTE-AM class, they DID finish the race.
                        Last edited by Vette Interested; 06-17-2023, 07:42 PM.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          That was great PR for NASCAR......the noise alone would make it a crowd favorite......I was fortunate to attend the Targa Florio back in the 60's when Shelby was there with his Cobra Team......of course they didn't win....but the crowd would just jump up and down in excitement when one of the Cobra's came thundering by...very few of them had ever heard or imagined what a American V8 would sound like.....

                          I have to add that yes technology is transformational .....but IHMO Can Am and TransAm were the Golden Age of road racing in America...
                          Last edited by bartruff; 06-11-2023, 09:56 PM.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by Foosh
                            Yes, once upon a time, but that's now ancient history. Everyone is restricted in class racing, and the NASCAR Camaro at Le Mans was just a demonstration project meant to build fan interest. There are no lessons to be learned from that.

                            You could have done the same demonstration project and power with a twin-turbo 3.8 Boxer engine or V6. Today's twin turbo Porsche 992 Turbo S (3.7L) street machine, is producing the same power as the LT6 in the street Z06, but the racing GT3 RS Porsche is limited to about 500HP just like the C8R.

                            I do know as an airline guy that 747s are now obsolete in favor of more efficient twins.
                            The class aircraft for trans-ocean flights is now the B777 and the forthcoming B777X. Both use twin HUGE separate flow turbofans like the GE90. Even more airflow than the earlier CF6 and PW9000 engines used on the B747. These engines are remarkable in power and fuel burn, but also in durability and life. Unlike earlier turbofans, these engines will likely never “cone off the wing” for normal maintenance during a B777’s 20-year economic lifetime.

                            These engines will be succeeded by GE’s RISE Open Rotor engines burning gaseous hydrogen (No GHG emissions) with TSFC’s 20% lower than today’s engines and rotor diameters from 12 to 15 feet. Exciting times for commercial aviation.

                            Comment

                            MECF_728x90_bottom

                            Collapse
                            Working...
                            X
                            👍